to be fair to the right, you could do these interviews on any number of topics and get dumb answers a la leno’s quiz bit.
to be fair to the right, you could do these interviews on any number of topics and get dumb answers a la leno’s quiz bit.
here’s obama praising bob rubin’s hamilton project, a think tank that promoted lots of the CRAP phony-financing ideas that led to the 2008 collapse.
the more i follow this bob rubin-as-obama-economic figurehead…the more i think of bush getting tag-teamed by dick cheney, don rumsfield, and the other asshole neoconservatives that erronously took USA into Iraq….
the goldman sachs, crony-banking ties to obama will sink him in 2010 if he doesn’t drastically change course.
from : http://www.tinyrevolution.com/mt/archives/000867.html
for those that don’t know…wesley mouch was one of the main spinless vague-speaking bureaucrats in ayn rand’s atlas shrugged.
timmy geithner is america’s wesley mouch…the central planner bureaucrat trying to ‘fix’ the economy with vagueness…
come on barack obama..where’s the change????…every day these asshole bankers are still in your white house you lose a little more credibility….fix the goddamn banks before you take on your pie-in-the-sky health for all beaurocrazy…
the bureaucrats in washington that created too-big-to-fail or the populist uprising against bailout-pa-looza?
excerpts:
“The question I have, of course, is why is the Obama administration, which has decried corporate greed whenever it’s politically feasible, allowed Goldman all the advantages of a bank, when it is really a big hedge fund?”
”Now with all the government help, Goldman is marching its way back up to $235 a share—trading at around $150 Monday—by embracing much of the same risk that nearly led to its demise. It would be nice, though, if the next time Goldman losses money taxpayers didn’t foot the bill.”
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-07-13/goldmans-fast-money/?cid=bs:archive8
another article on similar goldman-gov’t collusion:
these types of posts could become commonplace if the gov-ment continues to take over industry + putting no-experience beauracrats in charge…
excerpt:
WASHINGTON — It is not every 31-year-old who, in a first government job, finds himself dismantling General Motors and rewriting the rules of American capitalism.
But that, in short, is the job description for Brian Deese, a not-quite graduate of Yale Law School who had never set foot in an automotive assembly plant until he took on his nearly unseen role in remaking the American automotive industry.
Nor, for that matter, had he given much thought to what ailed an industry that had been in decline ever since he was born. A bit laconic and looking every bit the just-out-of-graduate-school student adjusting to life in the West Wing — “he’s got this beard that appears and disappears,” says Steven Rattner, one of the leaders of President Obama’s automotive task force — Mr. Deese was thrown into the auto industry’s maelstrom as soon the election-night parties ended.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/01/business/01deese.html?_r=4&emc=eta1
Obama Revises Campaign Promise Of ‘Change’ To ‘Relatively Minor Readjustments In Certain Favorable Policy Areas’
WASHINGTON—In a slight shift from his campaign trail promise, President Obama announced Monday that his administration’s message of “Change” has been modified to the somewhat more restrained slogan “Relatively Minor Readjustments in Certain Favorable Policy Areas.” “Today, Americans face a great many challenges, and I hear your desperate calls for barely measurable and largely symbolic improvements in the status quo,” said Obama, who vowed never to waver in his fight for every last infinitesimal nudge forward on the controversial issues of torture and the military ban on homosexuals. “Remember: Yes we can, if by that you mean tiptoeing around potentially unpopular decisions that could alienate a large segment of the populace.” Washington insiders said that, while the new mottos are certainly in keeping with Obama’s pledge of government transparency, they are significantly less catchy.
http://www.theonion.com/content/news_briefs/obama_revises_campaign?utm_source=onion_rss_daily
just a prelude of the central planning to come????
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124355327992064463.html
excerpt: 4) Why is the task force permitting GM to increase manufacturing overseas for export back into the U.S.? Under the GM reorganization plan, the company will rely increasingly on overseas plants to make cars for sale in the U.S., with cars made in low-wage countries like Mexico rising from 15% to 23% of GM sales here. For the first time, GM plans to export cars from China to the U.S. in what is a harbinger of the company’s future business model. What is the conceivable rationale for permitting GM to increase manufacturing overseas — especially in dictatorships, for export back into the U.S. — when preserving jobs and industry is the avowed goal of this immense taxpayer bailout?